GitHub's take on age assurance for developers

· security · Source ↗

TLDR

  • Age assurance laws targeting operating systems and app stores risk sweeping in open source projects and developer infrastructure like GitHub, package managers, and code platforms.

Key Takeaways

  • CA AB 1043, CO SB 26-051, IL HB 4140, and NY S 8102 all require OS-level age signals transmitted via real-time API to apps, with scope definitions broad enough to capture developer tooling.
  • Overly broad definitions of “application store” could capture package managers, code repositories, and open source indexing services that host downloadable software.
  • Brazil’s Digital ECA (enforceable March 2026) has already caused some open source projects to restrict access due to compliance uncertainty, despite regulatory signals favoring FOSS exemptions.
  • GitHub cites positive precedents: Australia’s social media age law and France’s proposal both explicitly exempt open source code collaboration platforms.
  • Colorado’s latest amended text clarifies software installed outside app stores, including from public repositories, is not in scope, showing developer engagement works.

Hacker News Comment Review

  • Thin discussion so far; one commenter floats display-side age verification using local camera inference as a privacy-preserving alternative, noting China already deploys this at scale for screen-time limits.

Notable Comments

  • @Animats: Proposes display-level camera age estimation done locally, bypassing OS/app store data collection entirely; points to existing Chinese deployments as proof of feasibility.

Original | Discuss on HN