TLDR
-
Head-to-head voting tool ranks industries by perceived societal harm, aggregating public opinion into a leaderboard snapshot.
Key Takeaways
-
Users vote on industry pairs based on personal values; results reflect aggregate harm perception, not objective metrics.
-
The framing explicitly avoids stigmatizing specific industries while surfacing overlooked societal impacts.
-
Stats are global and shared; no per-user tracking currently exists.
-
Leaderboard output doubles as an informal map of the economy sorted by public distrust.
Hacker News Comment Review
-
Commenters quickly noted the leaderboard reads as a broad economic snapshot, not just a harm ranking, suggesting dual utility.
-
The builder confirmed no user data is stored per session; regional or state-level breakdowns were flagged as a high-value missing feature.
Notable Comments
-
@DaryaHr: Suggested attaching nonprofit links to causes and connecting results to regional statistics for actionable downstream use.
Original | Discuss on HN
