Clarification on the Notepad++ Trademark Issue

· open-source security · Source ↗

TLDR

  • Don Ho confirms the Notepad++ trademark dispute is resolved after the Mac port removed all unauthorized uses of the Notepad++ name and branding.

Key Takeaways

  • The Mac port infringed the Notepad++ trademark; the issue is now resolved after the project removed all references.
  • GPL licensing covers code reuse freely, but does not grant rights to use the Notepad++ trademark or branding.
  • Don Ho’s core concern: an unofficial port bearing the Notepad++ name could ship malware or have unpatched vulnerabilities, damaging the project’s reputation.
  • Ports and forks are explicitly welcome under GPL; endorsement via trademark use is a separate, distinct matter.
  • The renamed project is now called Nextpad++.

Hacker News Comment Review

  • Commenters broadly agreed the issue was about deceptive official-looking branding, not opposition to the port itself – the original site apparently looked like an official release.
  • Several commenters noted trademark holders must actively defend marks to avoid abandonment or genericness, though one clarified you can grant permission rather than being required to block all use.
  • A security angle emerged: Notepad++ has previously been targeted by state-sponsored actors to deliver malware, making a fast-coded AI-assisted fork carrying the official name a serious supply-chain risk beyond just brand dilution.

Notable Comments

  • @zamadatix: Flags that the site’s email redaction was done incorrectly – content must be deleted before adding redaction decoration, not layered on top.
  • @ASalazarMX: Notes Notepad++ has been previously targeted by state-sponsored hackers; a March 2025 vibe/agent-coded fork using the brand is a concrete supply-chain risk.

Original | Discuss on HN